Razzak: Maybe I should submit this somewhere... But I think that all the "multiple dll copy" situations arise because people apply the updates differently than the original installation (typical vs. server).
This would be greatly diminished if, in the original installation, you could indicate which you wanted! And if you wanted "server" you wouldn't have to manually move files around. Since the update comes with the option to choose, can't the original install? Boy, if the program could be really smart, the update would check to see if the dlls are in the windows directory or not and automatically choose server install (and vice versa). Karen > Now all you have to do is keep up with it and make sure to pay > attention when applying the next updates (Typical vs. Server). > > When running application on a network, make sure to centralize > everything and don't forget to use "-A" option to force R:BASE > executable and/or your compiled .exe to look for all required > files (.DLLs, .CFG) in one place. > > Good luck and Very Best R:egards, > > Razzak.
