Ironically, I think that was addressed from Bill D this morning.

"You would rarely opt to avoid using an index. The rare circumstance would
be a query with many conditions in the WHERE clause, and where R:BASE's
query optimizer was not automatically picking the best index. You can force
it to go on to what it would consider the second-best index by putting the
first value (not the whole condition, but the value) in parentheses."


It's only really fresh to me because I had to read it twice. However you
could just index that table prior to?  


Sincerely,
Paul D.





-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of MDRD
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 1:32 PM
To: RBASE-L Mailing List
Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: compare rows in 2 tables

Thanks Dennis

I never knew you could do that.

I think the problem is a bad index making it look like there is 116 rows of 
data
doing a Select Count when in fact there is only 115 rows.

Is there a way to do
select count(*) from tran_daily where ........ that would not use the Index 
and show 115 rows?

What I am thinking is do 2
select count(*) from tran_daily  ..... and if those numbers do not match
Pack Index,

Thanks
Marc


--------------------------------------------------
From: "Dennis McGrath" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 12:14 PM
To: "RBASE-L Mailing List" <[email protected]>
Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: compare rows in 2 tables

> That statement takes way too much work for the engine on a large dataset.
> This would be better, and way faster. Custnum should be indexed in 
> tran_hist.
>
> Set eqnull on
>
> edit all from tran_Daily T1 +
> WHERE FAILS (SELECT Custnum FROM tran_hist +
>  WHERE Custnum = T1.custnum +
>  AND date_con = T1.date_con  +
>  AND tr_date = T1.tr_date +
>  AND ch_code = T1.ch_code +
>  AND ch_price = T1.ch_price +
>  AND ptest = T1.ptest +
>  AND cknum = T1.cknum +
>  AND date_frm = T1.date_frm +
>  AND date_to = T1.date_to
>  AND treat_dr = T1.treat_dr
>  AND inshold = T1.insold )
>
>
> Dennis McGRath
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
> This is what I am using but it finds no rows, yet my calculations show we 
> are missing some rows.
>
>   edit all from tran_Daily    +
>    WHERE ( CTXT(custnum) + CTXT(date_con) + +
>    CTXT(tr_date) + ch_code + CTXT(ch_price) + +
>    CTXT(ptest) + cknum +  CTXT(date_frm) + +
>    CTXT(date_to) + treat_dr + inshold  ) NOT IN +
>    (SELECT ( CTXT(custnum) + CTXT(date_con) + +
>    CTXT(tr_date) + ch_code + CTXT(ch_price) + +
>    CTXT(ptest) + cknum + CTXT(date_frm) + +
>    CTXT(date_to) + treat_dr + inshold)  FROM tran_hist)
>
> Thanks for any suggestions
> Marc
>
>
> 


Reply via email to