Mike,
 
Excluding the R:Base files would certainly help as they would not be
scanned; however, if the delay is caused by Symantec "hogging" resources,
then the obvious solution is to change the scheduler time when either your
utilities of Symantec run so there is no overlap. One of my clients uses AVG
anti-virus and I noticed than when it runs a scan, its use of resources goes
to close o 100% and the computer slows down to crawl, perhaps that is your
case as well. Most AV programs can be tweaked to use less resources; I have
not used Symantec for while so I cannot help you there ( I use Vipre),
hopefully someone with Symantec experience can chime in.
 
Javier,
 
Javier Valencia, PE
913-829-0888 Office
913-915-3137 Cell
913-649-2904 Fax
 <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]
 
  _____  

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
[email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 3:38 PM
To: RBASE-L Mailing List
Subject: [RBASE-L] - AV scan considerations
 
My computer runs about 300 R:BASE routines (data loads, reports, etc.)
against several databases every day.  The Symantec SEP program runs an AV
scan each Thursday morning.  Unfortunately the scan is co-incident with my
300+ routines.  The AV scan extends the run time of my programs by almost 3
hours.  It's not a good thing. 

I am wondering if excluding the databases from the scan would help.  Would
excluding my R:BASE command files help? 

Anyone else have experience and wisdom they could share regarding AV scan
configurations? 

Thanks 

Mike Ramsour 
AK Steel Coshocton Works 
 
 
Confidentiality Notice
This message is intended exclusively for the individual or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain privileged,
proprietary, or otherwise private information.  
If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized
to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or
any part of it.  If you have received this message in error,
please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

Reply via email to