Thanks for the reply, Razzak. >>01. 9.1 (32) or 9.1 (64)?
9.1 32 >>02. How did you convert the database from 7.6 to 9.1 (32/64)? I unloaded with 7.6 and reloaded with 9.1. Should I have connected with 9.1 first, and unload with that?? >>03. After migrating from 7.6 to 9.1, did you ever re-build the >> entire database using the traditional UNLOAD ALL method? >> Hopefully, you are not mixing and using two versions (7.6/9.1) >> on the same database. Fix was to add command to build a temp view of the temp table and base the report on that. I know, it does not make sense. Everything could see the temp table EXCEPT the report. Table name was correct in the report. No user change is made in the code, so the table should be available to everything. Very best regards, Dennis McGrath
