Karen,

Take a look a "nested sets".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nested_set_model
http://www.sqlteam.com/article/more-trees-hierarchies-in-sql

It takes a minute or two to wrap your head around, but is an elegant
solution (I think) to what you're proposing -- with unlimited levels. No
cursors, but could be write intensive if that is a concern, though I
wouldn't imagine any more than a cursor loop.

Ben




On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 8:55 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Dan:  That's the way I was going to go, a definite number of cursors.  I
> feel
> better knowing that at least one person did it in that manner!   I'll give
> it a while
> and if no one has code for unlimited levels, then I'll just go with that.
> Thanks!
>
> Karen
>
>
> In a message dated 3/15/2012 10:44:55 AM Central Daylight Time,
> [email protected] writes:
>
>
> I use cursors. I just set up for expected level of boms that we could
> possibly imagine using. We only go to a max of 6 levels down into the bom
> so I put in 8 cursor levels to just in case and put an error message if it
> finds something below 8 levels so I can add more someday.
>
> I know Rbase does not support celko’s nested boms so I use cursors instead.
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to