Most assuredly there is an rbengine76.cfg file on each computer since 7.6 was 
on there, but I doubt 9.5 would look at that.  In any case, my startup file has
    SET DATE SEQ MMDDYY
    SET DATE FORMAT MM/DD/YY

I never rely on cfg files for my database settings....

Karen


 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: jan johansen <[email protected]>
To: RBASE-L Mailing List <[email protected]>
Sent: Fri, Dec 21, 2012 2:38 pm
Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Strange printing issues


        Karen,
         
        This is a long shot.
        I have seen the  RBASE.CFG's show up on client workstations even though 
the CFG is on the server.
        Maybe that could cause the date wierdness.
         
        Jan
        
        
                -----Original Message-----
                From: Karen Tellef <[email protected]>
                To: [email protected] (RBASE-L Mailing List)
                Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 14:13:54 -0500 (EST)
                Subject: [RBASE-L] - Strange printing issues
                
                Client upgraded from 7.6 to 9.5, build 1212.   RBase is 
installed on the server, DLL/CFG moved to installation directory.  Workstations 
(mixture of Win 7 and XP) are running RBase from the server with -a parameter.
                
                Only problems noted are all printing related (both to the 
screen and printer).  There are random fields in a few reports that print 
perfect when I'm doing it dialed into the server, but are blank on the 
workstations.  The fields are text, either Arial or Courier New.  I cannot play 
alot with field length/height because they are going on preprinted reports. 
                
                At other times, reports without a display format defined for a 
date field will print out 4-digit years even though both sequence and format 
are 2-digit.  The problem with this is that they claim it works for a while 
showing 2 digits, then all of a sudden goes to 4 digits, then back to 2 
digits...  I've searched and there is nowhere in code where I change the date 
format, nor do we import/export files.   (Again, it works perfectly on the 
server)
                
                In the past, they had 7.6 installed locally on every 
workstation.  I did not bother uninstalling RBase 7.6 on the workstations or on 
the server since I've seen no indication at other clients that it would 
interfere with running 9.5, and all the filenames used are different between 
the 2 versions.  I wanted to get away from local installation in 9.5.  Do you 
think I need to install locally or uninstall 7.6?   
                
                I can fix the 2/4 digit year by modifying every report to put a 
display format, but this random skipping of fields is a deal-breaker that has 
to be figured out.
                
                Thanks for any suggestions you might have!
                
                Karen
                
                
                 

         
 

Reply via email to