This is so easy in excel. You just select scientific and the number of digits.
Am I overlooking something? -----Original Message----- From: "jan johansen" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] (RBASE-L Mailing List) Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 09:56:57 -0800 Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: report display problem Albert, I run into the same problem in that I can't seem to force scientific notation. Jan -----Original Message----- From: Albert Berry <[email protected]> To: [email protected] (RBASE-L Mailing List) Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 10:32:13 -0700 Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: report display problem Lookup BIGNUM - you can specify the bignum number to have only two digits, the way I read it. Albert On 11/6/2014 10:21 AM, jan johansen wrote: Maybe. But the displayed value can have no more than 2 significant figures. -----Original Message----- From: Albert Berry <[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] To: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] (RBASE-L Mailing List) Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 10:19:39 -0700 Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: report display problem Would BIGNUM work (assumes you are in 9.5 (64) ). For the report create a BIGNUM variable just for the display. Albert On 11/6/2014 9:51 AM, jan johansen wrote: Hey all, I have a formatting problem that I don’t believe that I can use formatting for. The requirement is that the displayed number (in a report) can have no more than 2 significant figures displayed. Non-zero digits are always significant. Thus, 22 has two significant digits, and 22.3 has three significant digits. With zeroes, the situation is more complicated:Zeroes placed before other digits are not significant; 0.046 has two significant digits. Zeroes placed between other digits are always significant; 4009 kg has four significant digits. Zeroes placed after other digits but behind a decimal point are significant; 7.90 has three significant digits. Zeroes at the end of a number are significant only if they are behind a decimal point as in (c). Otherwise, it is impossible to tell if they are significant. For example, in the number 8200, it is not clear if the zeroes are significant or not. The number of significant digits in 8200 is at least two, but could be three or four. To avoid uncertainty, use scientific notation to place significant zeroes behind a decimal point: 8.200 ´ 103 has four significant digits 8.20 ´ 103 has three significant digits 8.2 ´ 103 has two significant digits So I believe that the best thing for me to do is to use scientific notation. The column definition I have been using in the report is a Double. I cannot change the type but I know that this is a display issue. However, my attempts to “force” scientific notation have not worked. Any advice appreciated. Jan
