------------------------------------------------------------
>><A real index for the documentation would sure be nice.>
>If you have the latest update to the HTML help for Rbase includes this!
>or goto
>http://www.RSyntax.com
-------------------------------------------------------------
<sigh> That's not an index. It's a table of contents. If you have an old book, look in the back. That's an index.
From R:Syntax lets look at Forms:
Forms
This is a listing for the contents of the information.
----------------------------
From RBase 5.5 index, lets examine the "forms" entry:
FORMS
forms
Now THAT is an index. An index of the contents by specific, separate issues. You don't want to read through pages of form docs, you want to know about deleting that form with DROP.
Now, in a computer index, all those page numbers could be HTML links to the specific topics. In fact, you could have even more entrees, perhaps on a collapse-able index to include topics, perhaps even from this list. You're not wasting paper, or increasing printing and distribution costs:
Now, there IS a cost in extra content, people to edit, organize and create. But we have a ton of useful information that is generated on this list alone that is extremely useful, but effectively lost because it is not organized once revealed. "I KNOW I saw something like that on the list before... now what was it?"
I think the key here is to not only look at this as a cost, but as an opportunity. RBase is a wonderful tool, too bad it is so hard to tap into or troubleshoot many of the cool capabilities. I'd like to see a lot more people using it, but there is a ton of "hidden knowledge" that should be unleashed.
Ike
