We just ran a test on a server and across lines we have
zero control of, and are very unhappy with.
With Multi ON, staticdb OFF Multi ON, Staticdb ON
one user 15 sec 15 sec
two users 199 sec ! 189 sec
We're going to test on another server where we have a bit
more control of the environment.
But unfortunately we're probably stuck with the first
situation, which means we're doomed. No fix.
Douglas Daily
Payroll Manager
Facilities Services, box 352215
206-221-4357
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Albert Berry wrote:
> We tested with Staticdb on and off - it makes no difference. The only factor that
>changes the times dramatically like this is whether or not a second user is connected
>to the db. Multi on/off, staticdb on/off with and without fastlocks - only
>significant difference is caused by connecting a second user - who need do absolutely
>nothing, just connect, to kill the performance. W2000 servers only.
>
> There was a note on the list yesterday about server settings that our network team
>will have a look at.
>
>
