RE: RB Win 65++ on W2k Server

[aschmidt]

I also would like to see this topic discussed on the list.

We have been testing a W2K Terminal Server accessing an R:Base database on
an NT 4 Server.

It seems to work as expected, except that AUTOCHKs run on the databases on
the file server with this configuration run about 6 times slower than when
run from an NT or Win9x workstation.

Running the AUTOCHKs from a W2K Pro workstation also run at this very slow
speed.

AUTOCHKs run from a W2K Pro workstation on a local R:Base database run very
fast, however.

Our continuing tests will involve placing a copy of an R:Base database on a
W2K Server and also installing R:Base Runtime for Windows 6.5++ as well as
Terminal Server on it. We expect that since there will be no network access
of the database files because they will be local to the Terminal Server,
that throughput should be very high. I'll let the list know what we find.

Tony

Anthony Schmidt
President
The Computery Ltd.
One East Main Street
Bay Shore, NY  11706

Voice 631-665-8100
Fax 631-969-5988



                                                                                       
                                          
                    Troy Sosamon                                                       
                                          
                    <tsosamon@eapintl       To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]              
                                          
                    .com>                   cc:                                        
                                          
                    Sent by:                Subject:     RE: RB Win 65++ on W2k Server 
                                          
                    owner-rbase-l@son                                                  
                                          
                    etmail.com                                                         
                                          
                                                                                       
                                          
                                                                                       
                                          
                    08/01/2001 11:10                                                   
                                          
                    AM                                                                 
                                          
                    Please respond to                                                  
                                          
                    rbase-l                                                            
                                          
                                                                                       
                                          
                                                                                       
                                          




I think this topic should be discussed on the list.
I would like to see this also.

Troy
===== Original Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] at 8/01/01 5:59 am
>Begging the List's pardon, would someone kindly respond via private email
>with the tips on tuning for the above configuration?
>
>Many thanks ...