Yes R:Base is unique in many ways. It was true relational way before there
was anything else in that category for the PC.
I'm curious, what does the SQL standard say about this kind of name/type
relationship?
-- Dennis McGrath
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Tools for R:BASE programmers
http://www.enteract.com/~mcgrath/dennis
-- Full time consultant with SQL Resources
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of A. Razzak Memon
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 4:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: SCONNECT and Illegal Column Names
At 12:44 PM 8/22/2001 -0500, Dennis McGrath wrote:
>... Who would have forseen the need to avoid this strong
>name/type relationship ...
That's why it makes R:BASE the Industrial-Strength and
a True-Relational Database Management System!
Very Best Regards,
Razzak.
===================================-============================
R:BASE Developers's Conference: http://www.rbase.com/conference
Official R:BASE List Server: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RBTI Events/Training: http://www.rbase2000.com/events
R:DCC Members: http://www.rbase2000.com/rdcc
================================================================
R:BASE, Oterro & R:Tango are registered trademarks of RBTI.
==================================-=============================
