Patrick -
I have observed similar results with this version when I have
reached the end of the table and also when there are fewer rows available
from the table than there are tiers on the form.
Bernie
========================================
At 03:09 PM 10/11/2001 -0700, you wrote:
>> At 04:35 PM 10/9/01 -0700, you Patrick Murphy wrote:
>> >
>> >Running R:Base 2000 6.5++, Build 1.842xRT03. Have a table with a single
>> >field that I want to edit using a single page form with a region showing
>> >multiple records at a time. Several other fields are displayed on the
>form
>> >along with some look-up values, but only the single field is editable.
>> >
>> >I have not been able to duplicate this at my office. I have not been
>able
>> >to verify that the 2nd record was actually updated to the new value in
>the
>> >database. So a lot of unknowns still, but I wondered if anyone had any
>> >quick ideas?
>>
>> Patrick,
>> 01. Using windows explorer, search for RBASE.INI file.
>> 02. Make sure that there is ONLY one RBASE.INI file in PATH.
>> 03. Using any text editor or notepad, verify the following entries:
>> MSGPath=C:\RBTI\RBWIN65
>> HelpPath=C:\RBTI\RBWIN65
>> CFGFile=C:\RBTI\RBWIN65\RBASE.CFG
>> 04. Launch TGRB2000 (ver 6.5++), Build: 1.842xRT03.
>> 05. Right Click on Region > Remove Tiers
>> Check Field Settings for Column/Variable Objects accordingly.
>> Add Tiers ...
>> Razzak.
>
>Well, we did and checked all of Razzak's ideas and my client called today
>and said it was still happening. I brought the database up on my computer
>and was finally able to see it happen on mine! (I was beginning to think
>they were seeing things as this type of thing just isn't suppose to happen!)
>
>The tier is 15 records long, I changed the value of maybe the 3rd record
>down from a null to an '03' and when I clicked on the next record down I saw
>the value change on a record on about the 10th line. These were the same
>two records that were also observed changing on the client's database (I
>have a current copy).
>
>Unfortunately, I am unable to reproduce this problem consistently or I would
>report it to RBTI. To get around it for now (I hope), I plan to create a
>separate table with only this value and the linking relational column so
>that they can proceed with their work. The table that it is currently in
>has 175 columns and this field is indexed. As I stated earlier, the
>database was reloaded without errors yesterday.
>
>Any other ideas would be appreciated.
>
>Patrick Murphy
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
