NO!!!! You just didn't get there fast enough. Mike had already corrected it by the time you read it.
At 12:03 PM 8/21/2002 -0400, you wrote: >> the documentation is not correct. It is stated in the document you >> referenced that when the date sequence is set to MMDDYYYY and the date >> entered is 6/11/94 then the date stored is is 6/11/1994. This is not >> true. > >I think you have misread the documentation. The situation you describe >is the first line of the table which clearly says the date sotred is >6/11/0094. > >Regards, > >Stephen Markson >ForenSys The Forensic Systems Group >www.ForensicSystemsGroup.com >416 482 2140 > > > >================================================ >TO SEE MESSAGE POSTING GUIDELINES: >Send a plain text email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >In the message body, put just two words: INTRO rbase-l >================================================ >TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >In the message body, put just two words: UNSUBSCRIBE rbase-l >================================================ >TO SEARCH ARCHIVES: >http://www.mail-archive.com/rbase-l%40sonetmail.com/ > ================================================ TO SEE MESSAGE POSTING GUIDELINES: Send a plain text email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the message body, put just two words: INTRO rbase-l ================================================ TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the message body, put just two words: UNSUBSCRIBE rbase-l ================================================ TO SEARCH ARCHIVES: http://www.mail-archive.com/rbase-l%40sonetmail.com/
