I need to go back and check - 2 weeks holiday does wonders for my brain in some ways but not a lot for my memory! - but it seems to me that this is one of those subjects that needs a "from the edge" - the calculation order doesn't _seem_ to be as logical as expected. On the other hand, maybe it's just more logical than previous versions allowed you to get away with.
Either way, if RBTI can confirm a "problem" then I'd be interested in the solution because it sounds very similar to my experience - limited as it is with v7 reports. Regards, Alastair. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lawrence Lustig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "RBG7-L Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 6:17 PM Subject: [RBG7-L] - Re: Suppressing too many values in Report > > Assuming that you haven't simply got the size of the > > field too small - easy > > to do and nothing to show you it's wrong - then > > check that you have the > > calculations/expressions in the "right" sequence. > > I think they're OK. If I just switch the "Suppress > Repeat Values" flag off, then it prints the names (of > course, it prints them also where I don't want them, > that's why I'm trying to suppress them. > > > All I did was to move > > the position in the > > list - not the band - that the calcs were done. > > Only one expression in this report. > > I was able to duplicate the problem in ConComp and > have submitted a bug report. If you would like, I > would be happy to send you my (extremely simple) > ConComp report and you can try it out yourself. > -- > Larry >
