Thanks Razzak for your Continued Educational effort on this list.
What I would like right now is CCS-list where I I could put my Code
charge Studio questions. I do appreciate it is not a direct RBTI issue
and in last mail you help me one step forward I now have a Code Charge
Studio that speaks to Apace webbserver, so now I am scratching my grey
hairs to find out how to get PHP in there . I went for PHP since that
seems to be whar RBTI is going for. Should I unstill CCS (yes I did not
read fully RBTIS installtion tips) and reinstall? PHP (version 5.0.??
(Is 4.?? A beter choice right)) gave me a warning that I need to
configure apace myself.
I do understand that questions are pretty basic for knowledgabe people
but I am almost there trying to create my first Webb-page. So why not
create a similar list more deicated to
Code Charge Studio issues?

Gunnar Ekblad


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of A. Razzak
Memon
Sent: den 13 januari 2005 18:34
To: RBG7-L Mailing List
Subject: [RBG7-L] - Re: A Minory and a Major Event!


At 12:23 PM 1/13/2005, Gunnar Ekblad wrote:

>For R:Base community this may bee a minory event, but for me
>it is a Major. As off Today my last R:Base 2.11 went out of
>production. Replaced by a windows version 7.1. This was first
>time I did a straight conversion from 2.11 till Win 7.1. In
>previous cases I always did RBDOS6.5++/7.1 as an intermediate
>solution. In this case I threw away all my forms, reports,
>commandfiles and apps and recreated everything but the
>dbstructure from scratch, when you want to preserve as much
>as possible I still think an intermediate DOS 7.1 is better,
>But that is maybe Academic since as far as I know I was as
>yesterday the only one still running 2.11?
>Anyway I happy not to have to bother with server.sy5 anymore
>and running Bases without the Trace possibility (not to
>mention all the other good stuff that is now available).


Congratulations, Gunnar!

May you enjoy the benefits of staying CURRENT!

Very Best R:egards,

Razzak.

Reply via email to