Thanks Javier

I will try that and see what is the easiest
option for our user.  The only problem I
can see is they may have the same Item
name but a different description and this
may not find it.

Marc



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Javier Valencia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "RBG7-L Mailing List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 9:06 AM
Subject: [RBG7-L] - RE: Insert


> Marc:
> How are you loading the data? If you are using LOAD then you can use the
> NOCHECK option:
> CHECK
> NOCHECK
> CHECK turns on rule checking. When rule checking is on, R:BASE checks
input
> against data validation rules. NOCHECK turns off rule checking. CHECK and
> NOCHECK override the current setting of the SET RULES command. The default
> is CHECK.
> If you use this option, all data will be loaded and then you can just:
> DELETE DUPLICATES FROM ...
> Javier,
>
> Javier Valencia, PE
> President
> Valencia Technology Group, L.L.C.
> 14315 S. Twilight Ln, Suite #14
> Olathe, Kansas 66062-4578
> Office (913)829-0888
> Fax (913)649-2904
> Cell (913)915-3137
> ================================================
> Attention:
> The information contained in this message and or attachments is intended
> only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
> confidential and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission,
> dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon,
> this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient
> is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender
and
> delete the material from all system and destroy all copies.
> ======================================================
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Marc
> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 8:59 AM
> To: RBG7-L Mailing List
> Subject: [RBG7-L] - RE: Insert
>
> Hi Javier
>
> It is not the error message that is the problem
> but it seems that the insert command stops once
> it hits a row of data that violates the rule or PK.
> or am I missing something else?
>
>
> Marc
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Javier Valencia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "RBG7-L Mailing List" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 8:45 AM
> Subject: [RBG7-L] - RE: Insert
>
>
> > Marc:
> > I believe that if you:
> > SET MESSAGES OFF
> > SET ERROR MESSAGES OFF
> > The load will proceed without displaying the error codes.
> > Javier,
> >
> > Javier Valencia, PE
> > President
> > Valencia Technology Group, L.L.C.
> > 14315 S. Twilight Ln, Suite #14
> > Olathe, Kansas 66062-4578
> > Office (913)829-0888
> > Fax (913)649-2904
> > Cell (913)915-3137
> > ================================================
> > Attention:
> > The information contained in this message and or attachments is intended
> > only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
> > confidential and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission,
> > dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon,
> > this information by persons or entities other than the intended
recipient
> > is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender
> and
> > delete the material from all system and destroy all copies.
> > ======================================================
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Marc
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 8:39 AM
> > To: RBG7-L Mailing List
> > Subject: [RBG7-L] - Insert
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > I want to insert several hundred rows of data into
> > a table for my users.  The problem is some of them
> > already have some of these rows of data and when
> > the insert command tries to add a row that already
> > exists I get an error and the process stops.
> >
> > *there is a unique rule on the main column
> >
> > So, is there a better way to "insert" these rows
> > into their table and have it ignore the duplicate
> > rows but keep processing the rest of the rows
> > of data?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Marc
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to