I'm not sure if their relationship with their bicycle is much different than mine if they ride it.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 9:43 AM, David Faller <[email protected]> wrote: > Please... > > If NYT ever wants to claim that Californians are superficial ever again, > then they can refer back to this ridiculous article. Honestly, if these > photos portray ANYONE'S reality or relationship with a bicycle, then I want > no part of it. > > Redding (CA) Dave, riding his Noodle-wielding Ram like a normal person, and > not dressed like I should be selling ice cream from a cart, etc. Geez! > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* aaronweis <[email protected]> > *To:* RBW Owners Bunch <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Friday, April 17, 2009 12:11 AM > *Subject:* [RBW] New York Times Fashion Pieces on Dutch Bicycles > > > Funny lil bit about dutch bicycles as a new accessory in fashion. > http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/16/fashion/16CODES.html?em > > Fashion show with absurdly expensive outfits, and an equally absurdly > priced vintage Raleigh 3 speed at $275! > > http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2009/04/15/fashion/20090416-codes-slideshow_index.html > > Someone talking about the pleasures of upright bicycles. I especially > liked the line, "for men, there's been a little bit of a stigma > associated with things like fenders and a chainguard." Ha!! I guess > it depends on what biking circles you run in. No stigma in this group > that I'm aware of. > > http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2009/04/15/style/20090416-dutchbike-feature.html> > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
