I didn't realize you were being forced to read every topic whether you were interested or not. I'm trying to find out if anyone had heard anything about this, I am interested in it. In fact it is something Grant has specifically brought up in a past RR or catalog, (I can't remember which). Has anyone heard a possible link to the composite material being a cause?
I apologize if this in fact is too far off topic. If there are no other replies, so be it. On Jun 3, 7:32 pm, Gino Zahnd <ginoza...@gmail.com> wrote: > Can I beg everyone to not respond to this since it is so off topic? That, > and I can't take another religious carbon vs. aluminum debate. > > Gino > > > > On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Pete <p...@20kph.com> wrote: > > > Has anyone considered that the break up of that jet was due to it's > > "state of the art" composite materials not being able to stand the > > crazy turbulence? I am going to put it out there that these light > > weight new jets that are proven in the lab to be stronger than their > > old fashioned metal counterparts may now get a second look. Or maybe > > I'm completely off base. Just wanted to see if anyone who argues the > > steel versus carbon fiber real world strength had encountered a > > discussion about this. > > > Pete- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
