Admitting that I've never ridden a Bombadil, I would agree with Andrew's advice. If 68 cm Atlantis was what the OP had in mind, then 64 cm Bombadil would perform its duties admirably. Many accounts I've heard have said that the Bombadil performs on the road as a great touring bike. If I did my math right, the 64 cm Bombadil would fit just like a 68 cm Atlantis used to. On such a large bike, it seems the extra top tube will help a lot. (Rivendell has been adding tubes to bikes that large for a long time.) It seems that the 64 cm Bombadil would function like an Atlantis+. (Extra dirt capability being the +, and without sacrificing touring capability.)


-----Original Message-----
From: ANDREW LETTON
Sent: Jul 1, 2009 11:24 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [RBW] Re: large size touring bike?

How about a 64cm Bombadil?


--- On Wed, 7/1/09, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:

From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: [RBW] Re: large size touring bike?
To: [email protected], "happyriding" <[email protected]>
Cc: "RBW Owners Bunch" <[email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, July 1, 2009, 6:00 AM


Quoting happyriding <[email protected]>:

>
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know where I can get a 68cm Atlantis or another similarly
> large sized touring bike by the end of July?  (Note: Rivendell isn't
> making 66cm or 68cm Atlantis frames anymore.)


I'll bet Bruce Gordon would be able to fix you up with a Rock 'n Road 
Tour in that amount of time.  The sizing on this bike is a fooler: the 
size you want is usually around 10cm smaller than what you'd take on a 
traditional level top tube frame.  What could it hurt to ask?   
http://bgcycles.com/









--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to