I have to agree with James. Let's cool down the rhetoric about SIGG's hypocrisy until we can live a life that is devoid of criticism. Tests showed no leaching; SIGG has offered to replace the bottles; let's let them play this out. Regards,
Luke On Sep 20, 11:40 am, James Valiensi <[email protected]> wrote: > Hullo, > SIGG had the old liners tested by a independent tester and the results > shown that the SIGG bottles did not leach anything. So even though the > liners contain BPA it will not get into your water. > Why the massive rush to return your SIGG bottles? How's about the > environmental impact of that? > I'm keeping mine. And even if I feared leaching of BPA from the SIGG > liner I'd still would send them back, I'd find another use for them > and buy some new ones. No need to waste them. > Cheers! > > On Sep 20, 2009, at 8:47 AM, JoelMatthews wrote: > > > > > > > > >> Again, think about Rivendell having to deal with a recall on one of > >> their products. They'd have to assign some of their limited staff to > >> deal with that but would still be doing business as usual. > > > But at least from the address for returns, it seems Sigg hired a > > service here in the U.S. to handle the process. > > > It could be their employees still need to vett each return and enter > > the online data for the replacement order. I have no idea about > > that. > > > On Sep 20, 9:29 am, Tim McNamara <[email protected]> wrote: > >> It's a company with 127 employees worldwide, almost all of them in > >> Switzerland, processing thousands if not hundreds of thousands (who > >> knows, maybe millions. I have no idea how many bottles Sigg sold in > >> those years, but it's bound to be considerable) of returns. There > >> might be five or ten people processing all of the US returns and with > >> our tendency to instant-on panic mode over things like this there are > >> going to be a lot of returns here. It's not going to be an fast > >> process, give it some time. > > >> Again, think about Rivendell having to deal with a recall on one of > >> their products. They'd have to assign some of their limited staff to > >> deal with that but would still be doing business as usual. > >> Everything would be slower- new order fulfillment as well as > >> processing the recall. All the RBW folks would (hopefully) > >> understand this- because Rivendell is not a faceless corporation to > >> us- and cut them some slack. We should do the same with Sigg. > > James Valiensi, P.E. C.E.M. > Northridge, CA USA > M.818.585.1796 > [email protected] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
