I have had a couple setups where the 4 tooth spread with the Dingle cog was matched by a 4 tooth spread in the rings, so the axle position stays almost the same in high gear and low gear. Mostly that was for my OCD (and fender line). The Quickbeam as shipped had an 8 tooth spread in the rings (32/40), and a single cog (18t). The long angled dropouts (track ends) took up the chain slack.
Philip www.biketinker.com On Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 7:10:47 PM UTC-7, Joe Bernard wrote: > > 107 sounds a little short, but you may get away with it with those narrow > chainstays. I believe the idea with 2 cogs 2 chainrings was that you could > (theoretically) switch the chain from big/small to small/big without having > to reposition the rear wheel. I'm not sure how well that worked in actual > practice, though. You'll be fine with a single up front if you don't mind > sliding the wheel. > > Also, be aware that Dos requires a 9-speed-or-narrower chain to fit > between the cogs. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
