By "not long enough," I mean not long enough to span distance created by the long chainstays; those lower seatstay braze-ons are quite a bit forward of the drop-out braze-ons.
And here you can sort of see what I mean about the interference when the two braze-ons are stacked (though a better shot would show the fact that the fender stay protrudes forward into the plane that some rack legs would likely want to occupy) <https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-rYL1maoFr_M/VrkzvI-1clI/AAAAAAAAGBE/El-oRb2vjSY/s1600/DSC01762.JPG> : <https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-rYL1maoFr_M/VrkzvI-1clI/AAAAAAAAGBE/El-oRb2vjSY/s1600/DSC01762.JPG> On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 7:24:00 PM UTC-5, Mark in Beacon wrote: > > I assume the seatstay was added to accommodate racks that are not long > enough to reach the upper braze-ons--in this position, a rack designed for > a 26" bike might work well on the 650B and 700c Clems. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
