This anti-disc, pro rim-brake argument feels like flogging a dead horse. 
I've ridden more than enough disc brake bikes to know the appeal and 
see/feel firsthand how they surpass rim brakes in so many ways. I'm in no 
way anti-rim brake, in fact I'm usually the odd-man out on rides as the 
only rim-brake guy, still race canti-brake CX bikes, etc etc etc. 

Just because rim brakes technically have more mechanical advantage, by way 
of being further from the hub, doesn't mean anything positive or negative 
on its own. Just because disc rotors are close to the hub and require more 
stopping force and frame construction considerations also doesn't mean 
anything positive or negative on it's own. So disc brakes frames need 
stouter construction and re-enforcement....and? I find it particularly 
amusing coming from Rivendell, who's frames are not exactly known for being 
built to be light. Yes, discs put large forces on a frame, but who cares? 
That can be mitigated by design. The fact is, while rim brakes work quite 
well in most regular circumstances (dry, warm) discs have better and 
stronger stopping power in lousy conditions than rim brakes will have. 

I remember coming down Rainier on my Atlantis while it was drizzling, 
loaded with front panniers and saddle bags. Normally I can lift my rear 
wheel off the ground with the Paul touring canti's, bike unloaded. I was 
coming down at about 60km/h, not a crazy speed on a bike by any means, and 
it took me probably 100 meters to come to a stop. I was shocked, and 
getting ready to jump off my bike into the ditch as I realized I would be 
sailing through the intersection at the bottom of the hill. Wet rims = 
compromised braking. Wet rotors = basically no difference. 


In winter, when I bring my bike outside into sub-zero temperatures, the 
warm rims melt the snow as I ride. After applying the brakes, that melted 
water is spread nice and evenly across the brake track, which freezes 
shortly after. Many times I've had ZERO braking ability within two blocks 
of leaving because of this issue. Discs don't run through the snow and are 
way less susceptible to this problem.

So basically, rim brakes work wonderfully, in some/most circumstances (If I 
lived in Texas I'd probably never need discs). But disc brakes work just as 
well in those circumstances, and better in the areas rim brakes fall short, 
though require some frame construction considerations to be safe. I think 
most people would agree with that. 

So, I fail to understand why any bike manufacturer would refuse to consider 
building a bike with discs. If the drawback of discs are hubs popping out 
of forks (lawyer lips, front-facing drop outs, and through axles solved 
this already), and frame stress (build the frame accordingly, like pretty 
much most frame builders out there are doing now), that seems like a pretty 
paltry price to pay compared to the stated drawbacks of rim brakes: 
possibly popping tubes and crashing form overheated rims (I know a guy who 
had this happen on FLAT ground in Texas heat!), or having little to no 
braking from wet/frozen surfaces, or compromised brakes as a result of bent 
rims.... seems like an easy call? Disc = your frame needs heavy 
re-enforcement. Rim = it almost always works, but when it doesn't you're in 
for a RUDE surprise. Kinda reminds me of the argument Riv uses against 
Carbon frames - they usually work, but when they fail, they fail 
catastrophically.... 

One of the things i love about the Rivendell brand is championing bicycle 
design that just works, stuff that makes sense and is no-nonsense. To me, 
that is exactly what disc brakes are. I think that is why this debate irks 
me (can you tell LOL), because I agree with pretty much all 
Grant/Rivendell's opinions except this one. I love my Atlantis, most of the 
time have no complaints about it's braking abilities, love the look of 
canti's more than any other braking system, and will continue to have rim 
brake bikes in the future I'm sure. But man... A disc option of this bike? 
Or a disc Hunq? I'd be over the moon for that. 

On Friday, May 13, 2016 at 9:19:47 AM UTC-5, Will wrote:
>
> Might be nice to push back to GP and encourage more of these posts. 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to