To be precise: the 175s feel harder to spin at higher cadences; for me, that;s 90+. They feel easier to spin, or to get up to a certain cadence, *maybe,* at lower cadences, and given the bulk and diameter and contact patch of the wheels -- 61 mm actual -- compared to the ~ 27 to 31 mm but far smaller wheels of the other 3 bikes. Frankly, if you held a gun to my head and said, "Choose *one*!" I'd just choose 170s.
On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 10:59 PM, Patrick Moore <bertin...@gmail.com> wrote: > I like to think I can get torque slightly more easily with the 175s on my > Matthews, but really, what I feel is that they are slightly harder to spin > compared to the 170s I use on everything else. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
