I'm 6' with an 88 pbh and I'm riding a 59 Clem L. I'm the opposite of your
wife- relative to my height, I have short legs and a long torso/arms.
I love the way my Clem fits, but I have a really small amount of seat
post showing (you can kind of see it here
<https://www.instagram.com/p/BaES0xKH8pQ/?taken-by=bread_palace>, I'll try
to take a better photo today). If I lowered my saddle any more I'd risk
having the tip of the seatlug floating in space. I'm resigned to a
"finger-full" of seat post on Riv's because that's what gets me the reach I
like without a 14cm stem. You might want to figure out the saddle to bars
distances on the 52 and 59 to make sure you can get the reach you want with
a stem in the normal size range.
On Saturday, February 3, 2018 at 9:21:48 PM UTC-5, tc wrote:
> The 52 and 59 Clem L's sizing overlaps quite a bit. Does anyone out there
> with a 52 Clem L and an 87-88 PBH wish they'd gotten a 59? Or vice-versa?
> My wife is considering one. We'll talk with the Riv folks, but I'd love
> to hear of any experience you all have if you're in the same PBH range with
> either size Clem L. If you have a pic showing how much saddle post is
> showing that'd be even better - thanks.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.