Just give it an honest title, why be disingenuous?
On Friday, February 23, 2018 at 1:48:48 PM UTC-8, Michael Hechmer wrote:
> First, I did not introduce an irrelevant political topic, at least not any
> more than a discussion of say AAA's opposition to bike lanes might be
> considered outside the bounds of this group. Second, I did not explicitly
> ask anyone to accept my political position, or for that matter did I even
> state it. I simply offered information to be considered. Third, my
> posting title may have lead some to jump to false assumptions if they were
> only considering their own safety. Finally, yes, one can construct an
> argument that my post was outside the bounds of this lists, but one would
> then have to also exclude everything GP has written about helmets and
> clothes. I can remember many lengthy threads on this list about diets,
> about which we do not agree, and have nothing to do with RBW, other than
> GPs espousal. I am not asking for a discussion, I simply inform you where
> your money goes when you buy Bell or Giro helmets.
> On Friday, February 23, 2018 at 12:22:54 PM UTC-5, Wayne Naha wrote:
>> Nothing wrong with the helments, so yeah, misleading title. Clickbait,
>> even. As for the rest of it, this is not a political forum.
>> On Wednesday, February 21, 2018 at 6:57:25 PM UTC-5, Michael Hechmer
>>> Before you buy your next helmet you should consider this:
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.