Large. 62 is a touch too large... :-) On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Seth Vidal <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 6:30 PM, cyclotourist <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Saw that, too. Tempted to get a 60cm as my 62 is just a touch too small. > > Just swapping parts would be cool, then sell my 62... Hmmmm > > > > > Your 62cm is too small so you'd get a 60cm? > > maybe my math is off but 62 is still bigger than 60, right? > > -sv > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "RBW Owners Bunch" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<rbw-owners-bunch%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en. > > -- Cheers, David Redlands, CA "Bicycling is a big part of the future. It has to be. There is something wrong with a society that drives a car to workout in a gym." ~Bill Nye, scientist guy -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
