I’ve just put a Shimano Hollowtech II drive train on my A. Homer Hilsen 
frame.
I’ve seen a few Hollowtech II installations on this forum, and, boy, would 
I like some comments and advice.

When I retired I went out and bought a Sam Hillborne.
I live on Silver Comet trail and I like the feel of steel, and the “light 
touring, some gravel, do anything” Rivendell philosophy really appeals to 
me.  This was a great decision and the Sam is an excellent bike; heavily 
ridden for 4 years.  

I got a road bike (lugged steel) that had a square taper bottom bracket.  I 
replaced that with a Shimano Hollowtech II Sora system, and the difference 
was significant.  It felt “better”, in stiffness, positive shifting, 
transmitting pedal force to the bike, you name it.  Subjective, yes, but 
the reason for this post.

So I got an A. Homer Hilsen frame.  I built it up in the usual Riv style 
with Tektro 559 brakes, Albatross bars, Nitto post/stem, and Velocity Atlas 
650b wheels.  Then I installed a Shimano Hollowtech II M590 drive set.

Questions:

My AHH seems to not able to make up its mind if it is road or MTB.  While 
it uses the road standard 68mm bottom bracket, rear axle spacing is MTB 
(135mm).
The front chainline on my Sam was 45mm - road.  Rivendell sent me the Sam 
with a 2-speed front and Claris road bike derailleur.  I removed the guard 
and added a third ring.  That made the chainline 47.5mm, so I put in a 
Shimano Sora FD-3030.  I run front chainrings of 46-36-26 on the Sam.
When I built up the Homer, the M590 bottom bracket specified a spacer 
combination to make it MTB spacing (73mm, 50mm chainline), and again the 
road derailleur was struggling.  In this case I rearranged spacers to move 
the entire BB and crank 3mm left to solve the chainline problem.
Thoughts?  Has anyone found other solutions to the road/MTB front chainring 
alignment?  I realize that on derailleur bikes a chainline is a theoretical 
concept…but it affects front shifting.  And I didn’t want the road 
chainrings.

The latest Shimano Deore stuff seems to be heading towards 10-speed and 
175mm crank arm length.  My Rivs don’t like a 175mm crank due to the low 
bottom bracket, so I’m stuck with 170mm.  But are folks putting 10-speed 
equipment (cassette and chain) on a Riv?  If so, what problems have you run 
into? [lack of shifters?, etc.]

Along both of those lines, the Shimano “Trekking” groupsets (T6000 & T8000) 
are 3x10-speed systems that seem geared between MTB and road.  3-speed with 
front rings of 48-36-29. Has anybody tried one of these on a Riv?

Does anyone have experience with the Shimano Hollowtech II Deore equipment 
as to durability?  I may like the feel better than a Suguino XD2/square 
taper set-up, but those seem relatively bulletproof, and I can get 
chainrings in a lot of places.  Do the new Shimano front cranks take the 
abuse?

I know this is all heresy.  Rivs are supposed to look like 1980s Japanese 
road bikes with bigger tires - hence the Silver and Suguino chain rings and 
friction shifters.  But what I really like is touring - asphalt roads, 
cinder towpaths.  The feel of the Hollowtech II system is real for me, and 
I’m not as concerned with classic looks.
Besides, an AHH looks pretty good with black highlights.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/1b136da0-cb92-4139-8d0f-5efa23af4cec%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to