|
But I think the '93 was a bit better in versatility than the '92. The cantis and tire clearance are great. The '93 XO-1 is still one of my most versatile bikes. It holds up well compared to my Rivendells. The 26ishness of it is what distinguishes it from my large Rivendells.
-----Original Message----- From: PATRICK MOORE Sent: Mar 31, 2010 12:32 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [RBW] Re: Bonkers
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:20 AM, cyclotourist <[email protected]> wrote:
I disagree. Whether Monets, bikes or pennies, collecting stuff for the purpose of collecting is pretty sucktastic.
I wouldn't go as far as Jim (it *is* "Jim", is it not?), but I too am surprised and amused by the XO cult. I owned an XO-1, and IMO it's principal contributions were, (1) it alerted me to the possibilities of 26" wheels for road bikes and, (2) it introduced me to Grant-designed frames, of which, now, I have owned four. But IMO, at least compared to Riv's later offerings, 559, 584 or 622, the XOs -- including my 1992 XO-1 -- have been far, far FAR -- how can I emphasize this enough? -- surpassed by later Riv offerings. My new (!!) Sam Hill is a far, far FAR better allrounder than that XO-1, in tire clearance, handling, fit, comfort, quality, younameit. -- Patrick Moore Albuquerque, NM For professional resumes, contact Patrick Moore, ACRW at [email protected] (505) 227-0523
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected].
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
|