Interesting the Harry Hugel is a commenter on the Alex Singer example. My hypothetical 54 will not be affected, either way
On Apr 3, 10:20 am, newenglandbike <[email protected]> wrote: > Well I guess there are two ways it could go: raising the > intersection with the seat-tube or lowering the intersection with the > headtube (or downtube if it goes that far) so that it becomes closer > to horizontal like this: > > http://www.fooriders.com/images/bikes/willits/frame.jpg > > or lowering the intersection with the seat-tube so that it comes > closer to bisecting the front triangle like this: > > http://www.flickr.com/photos/bicigirl/4037516334/ > > To be honest, now that I think about it either one would be pretty > neat. > > On Apr 3, 12:52 pm, Matt Critchlow <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I did see this. Not sure what to make of it. I actually like the way > > it looks now, but it does sound really interesting. What do you think > > he means? Diagonal in which direction? > > > On Apr 3, 9:48 am, newenglandbike <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Just noticed this latest blog post on the riv site: > > > >http://www.rivbike.com/blogs/news_post/223 > > > > Looks like the second TT on the hunqapillar may change to a more > > > diagonal orientation. I'm not sure exactly what that means, but if > > > it's what I think it means, it will be pretty cool. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
