I’d classify members of my family as science-skeptical, like a number of the higher up posts, so I am not As deeply offended as others, but I’m growing more and more curious. I would ask what anyone who resists doing what every scientist and expert is suggesting expects to gain from such resistance.
My father found a small flaw on a graph today and used that as evidence that “nobody really knows what’s going on”. That seems to be the line on a bunch of stuff. Climate change- “nobody knows everything/the jury is out.”. I don’t understand the need to shove these tiny wedges into what we do know. Who does it help? What does anyone gain? What do you personally gain by downplaying the information of people who know more than you on a certain subject? Where does the need to do that downplaying come from? Seems like the potential damage of using irrelevant info to dismiss relevant info is...risky. The conversation I had today was frustrating. Excuse the venting. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/b0343999-e4bd-4e98-b13e-bb1a73c97f1b%40googlegroups.com.
