Some Salukis had mounts for side pull brakes and some had canti posts. The geometry chart for the Saluki is on this page at the bottom: http://www.cyclofiend.com/rbw/geometry.html
Yes, the Saluki was essentially a Hilsen with 650b tires. For a while, Rivendell offered both. The Saluki name and graphics were for smaller frames and the Hilsen for larger. On Sunday, April 12, 2020 at 8:18:27 AM UTC-7, j.schwartz wrote: > > Was unusual for this frame to be made without canti posts? or there were > just different runs? > Does anyone know the standover for the 56 with presumably the max tires > under fenders? This frame was essentially a 650b proto hilsen if I > remember correctly? > Were there any differences? > How is it different from a Bleriot? > > > > > > On Sunday, April 12, 2020 at 3:29:38 AM UTC-4, Joe Bernard wrote: >> >> I tell ya, Ted, I love the traditional look of a flat toptube but I see >> why they've largely fallen out of favor. The reach on that frame would fit >> me perfect with a Bosco-ish bar, but the saddle would be slammed and I >> would have 0 standover. Dangit! > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/b11178ae-f68d-452d-a0fe-c891aeff5854%40googlegroups.com.
