> Seth was right, there really is nothing new. Can say that again:
http://www.auctionflex.com/showlot.ap?co=9768&weid=11890&weiid=4178986&mindate=20100319&maxdate=20110319&lso=lotnumasc&pagenum=1&lang=En On Apr 12, 5:26 pm, William <[email protected]> wrote: > As I understand it, a Monstercross is one of many alternative mountain > bikes. The key defining characteristics of a monstercross appear to > be: > > 700C wheels > No suspension > Drop or drop inspired handlebars > > >45c tires > > Clearly the Hunqapillar could easily have all the above, so I guess it > could be a monstercross. Put racks and smooth fatties on it, then > it's your new category, the monster tour. I guess there are Adventure > Touring and Expedition categories, though. Seth was right, there > really is nothing new. > > On Apr 12, 3:15 pm, JoelMatthews <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Never heard that term before. > > > Does Monster Cross refer to a cross county race in real rugged > > conditions? Or does it mean real long self-supported tours? > > > I see the Hunq as possibly a very good candidate for the latter. I > > think racers would be concerned about the weight - aren't racers > > always obsessing about weight - of the Hunq. > > > As for water bottle placement - the old French diagonal campers found > > room for multiple bottle cages. Not sure why a Hunq with a diagnoal > > tube would not. > > > > Why does everybody try to categorize everything? > > > I read somewhere (maybe the NYTimes?) that most humans will > > comfortably follow three sub-plots in a novel or movie. Any more, > > they lose place and ultimately interest. Probably the need to plug > > things into pigeon holes helps people keep to three sub-plots in life. > > > On Apr 12, 4:56 pm, William <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > So does the Hunqapillar qualify as a Monstercross bike? I wasn't > > > familiar with the term until recently. Why does everybody try to > > > categorize everything? > > > > On Apr 8, 7:22 am, JoelMatthews <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I'm wondering out loud ... if extra diagonal type tubed frames were so > > > > > popular ..... why are they not sold in mass? > > > > > I see a warmish response here in this forum .... but you know how some > > > > > things go ..... people say they love the design ..... but when it > > > > > comes time to actually > > > > > buy and own one ..... "personal reality" checks in. . . . and they > > > > > may not want it. It's like seeing a fancy prototype at the bike > > > > > show .... it looks great .... you drool over it ... > > > > > but you just don't get one ..... for whatever reason..... usually it's > > > > > too far "out of the norm". What would so and so think? ... etc. > > > > > I missed this from Garth earlier. Couldn't one say the same about any > > > > Riv design, or, for that matter, lugged steel bike? If lugged steel > > > > bikes are sold in mass, I have yet to see them. > > > > > Bikes with extra tubes are more expensive to make, and thus buy. They > > > > are also heavier than most bikes. Many people never ride with loads > > > > and to places such a bike would be needed. For those few who do, > > > > having some attractive priced options from Riv make sense. > > > > > On Apr 7, 6:40 pm, James Dinneen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Good point about the water bottles. In particular, a touring bike > > > > > should have multiple, easily available water bottles. Jim D. > > > > > Massachusetts > > > > > > --- On Tue, 4/6/10, Garth <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > From: Garth <[email protected]> > > > > > Subject: [RBW] Re: Diagonapillar > > > > > To: "RBW Owners Bunch" <[email protected]> > > > > > Date: Tuesday, April 6, 2010, 9:05 AM > > > > > > If they're going diagonal ..... what do they do about water bottles ? > > > > > Design is one thing, but what about practicality? > > > > > > While I agree with GP that triangles look better, and bicycles are all > > > > > about triangles ...... more of them doesn't necessarily mean better. > > > > > Double top tubes parallel > > > > > looks masculine...... works great for carrying and stand > > > > > mounting....... a diagonal or mixte tube doesn't. > > > > > > I'm wondering out loud ... if extra diagonal type tubed frames were so > > > > > popular ..... why are they not sold in mass? > > > > > I see a warmish response here in this forum .... but you know how some > > > > > things go ..... people say they love the design ..... but when it > > > > > comes time to actually > > > > > buy and own one ..... "personal reality" checks in. . . . and they > > > > > may not want it. It's like seeing a fancy prototype at the bike > > > > > show .... it looks great .... you drool over it ... > > > > > but you just don't get one ..... for whatever reason..... usually it's > > > > > too far "out of the norm". What would so and so think? ... etc. > > > > > > The mind is an never ending ride to nowhere. > > > > > > -- > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > > > Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. > > > > > To post to this group, send email to > > > > > [email protected]. > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > > [email protected]. > > > > > For more options, visit this group > > > > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.-Hidequoted > > > > > text - > > > > - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
