Rene Your 60cm Bombadil has an effective top tube length of 63cm. So the 58cm Hunqapillar will be 1cm shorter in reach than your Bombadil, and the 58cm Hunqapillar will have 2cm more standover clearance than your Bombadil. Seems like the 58 Hunqa fits nicely between a 56 Bomba and a 60 Bomba. Maybe you need another bike, and should put the Noodles on the Hunqapillar and the Bullmoose bars on your Bombadil. That would be sweet!
On May 4, 1:25 pm, Rene Sterental <[email protected]> wrote: > That would be too long for me, as the Bombadil 60 has a top tube of 61 and I > wouldn't be able to use a shorter frame. The 54 would end up being quite > low, forcing a lot of seat post/stem to show to reach the right height and > bar/saddle height ratio... > > I guess that will still keep my best fitted on my Bombadil... which is > always good to reconfirm. > > René > > On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 11:47 AM, William <[email protected]> wrote: > > The 58 claims to have a 60cm effective top tube > > length and the final will be a 62 or so. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "RBW Owners Bunch" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
