> other is not, is there any real tangible difference? Is the Waterford > one better? better quality? better construction? better riding? longer > lasting? better... something? or are we just talking about ideas and > ideals?
Waterford has been making highly regarded bikes for quite some time now. What was the Taiwan factory making before it started making Rivs? On May 5, 3:54 pm, cm <[email protected]> wrote: > Does it really matter? outside of the fact that one is MUSA and the > other is not, is there any real tangible difference? Is the Waterford > one better? better quality? better construction? better riding? longer > lasting? better... something? or are we just talking about ideas and > ideals? Would you actually recommend that someone buy the Waterford > HIllborne over the "normal" HIllborne? If so, why? or, for that > matter, why not? Do you think Riv thinks they are different? > > This is a a tough question for me-- I go back and forth. > > Hmmmmmm..... > cm > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "RBW Owners Bunch" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
