Ryan: Thank you! Perhaps this might work. 26 X 4 or 622 X 3. There's this for minimum 2 mm crank clearance per side:
But: Crank clearance Chainstay width is 140mm, crank arms must have 144mm inner width, 24mm spindle recommended That leaves 16 mm total or 8 mm per arm for arm thickness. The WI Eno crank is with the Monocog at the LBS, but my Logic crank arms are 13.13 mm wide, and my TA Pro 5 Vis arms are 14.54 mm wide. Let's say 26.5 mm: 144 + 26.5 mm (I know that 0.5 mm don't mean a thing practically) = over 170 -- well beyond the 160 mm limit to my Q factor comfort. Oh well ... Still, interesting to see that 26X4 and 28X3 are given as suitable alternatives. On Sun, Jun 5, 2022 at 6:09 PM Ryan Frahm <frah...@gmail.com> wrote: > Tumbleweed Prospector frame? Then you’d be able to play around with the > tire sizes! And selfishly, I get to see another sweet prospector build. > Haha! > > On Sun, Jun 5, 2022 at 4:49 PM Patrick Moore <bert...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Ryan and Hotch: Thanks, but a 3" tire, or rather rims and frame that >>> allow full 3" plumpness of my WTB Rangers, labeled 3", is not a variable; >>> I've long since worked out what I want, which is not a sand bike but a >>> sand-capable all-rounder. >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/CALuTfgvAPx1KaN8qY%3D-4w3pjFFf5Lh1PbhKFK_K0KZA3ketjWQ%40mail.gmail.com.