I share your thoughts Jay. I took my Roadini on a mostly-road ride today, but mixed in some mellow gravel trails and singletrack. The bike is unperturbed. Is it a mountain bike? No. But it can go anywhere. I'm reminded of some words by Will from Riv where he said the Roadini opened up his riding to be able to take the singletrack shortcut to bypass a busy road, etc. It's true.
I recently read an old Riv Reader (from 2005 or so) where they introduced the concept of 'Country Bikes'. I think the current Roadini with its wider tyre clearance fits the description to a tee, and looks very much like the Saluki they used to illustrate the concept. Sure, with the proliferation of gravel bikes today, the idea of a 'country bike' as a category has become reality. But by 2005 standards, I'd say the current Roadini is a country bike. The world hasn't changed that much since then - just our perceptions of it and what we think is necessary. On Saturday, 22 March 2025 at 23:44:16 UTC+10:30 Jay wrote: > I've now had two mixed surface rides with the Roadini, with a nice dash of > trails thrown in (which is my favourite type of ride BTW). If I take it > slow, the Roadini with its 43mm slick tires is fine; fun, actually. On the > same day though I took out my Fargo with its Alt bars, 2.2" tires, and it > was night-and-day. I can fly with the Fargo, corner hard with a lot of > confidence. I could not do that with the Roadini (with my skills, or lack > thereof). What's great though, is that on the Roadini I can ride almost > anywhere, comfortably as I'm alternating between paved, unpaved, which is a > lot of fun. When I want to hit my local trails (90% unpaved), I would > definitely reach for the Fargo. > > On Wednesday, March 19, 2025 at 8:14:01 PM UTC-4 Jay wrote: > >> I finally got to take the Roadini for a spin on my local trails, some of >> them anyways. >> >> It has been cold recently and the snow and ice on the trail was >> pervasive. One or two rain falls and some warmer temps in the last 5-10 >> days, and with today being over 20C, I finally got to give this a go. I >> dropped pressure on the 43mm GKSS down to 30R and 28F (I'm 160lbs). 90% of >> the ride was on the trails. I really noticed the difference with the lower >> pressure, from say 35-40psi which I would normally run these tires when 90% >> paved. It made the ride very smooth (not 2.2" tire smooth). What was >> great was the comfort on the bike; riding trails only took a little of that >> away with the extra upper body effort required and more climbs/descents and >> posture that I don't often use on paved surfaces. I was surprised that the >> braking was more than adequate, and really enjoy being in the drops on >> descents for extra control. The tires were probably the only downside, >> partly due to my lack of skill. I had a bit of a rear-tire slide a couple >> of times on slick turns, but once I realized it was happening I rode more >> cautiously rest of the time. I think with 42-45 aggressive tread this bike >> would be more than capable for the trails in my area. >> >> P.S. one of my other posts is about alt/swept bars that I'm putting on my >> Salsa Fargo. I look forward to comparing performance between the bikes, >> and comfort (on these trails). >> >> On Saturday, March 15, 2025 at 10:48:03 AM UTC-4 John Dewey wrote: >> >>> I, too, think five is an ideal, manageable number so I’ve been settled >>> on it for quite some time as well. >>> >>> That said, there remains an inclination to hoard spare mechanicals to >>> keep them running, however, so I am not completely off the hook. A bit of >>> the hoarding instinct I’ve embraced. If you’re patient and keep looking you >>> can pick up the good stuff—known as NOS—our favorite acronym. >>> >>> And all but one are 9-speed so that keeps things simple. I found a guy >>> quite a while ago now who had a seemingly bottomless supply of low-normal >>> 9-speed derailers…so I kept buying. It got a little out of hand but that’s >>> OK. I enjoy taking inventory and oogling over the results of my obsessions. >>> These days most bike dealers are of no use to me, so I take care of myself. >>> >>> I do, however, pine for the days we could pop into the local shop to >>> survey the beautiful, colorful steel hanging from the rafters and all those >>> Campy boxes with the world stripes neatly inventoried. Not many of these >>> around any more. Andy Muzi’s Yellow Jersey in Madison WI was one I could >>> never pass by without stopping. >>> >>> Fortunately there’s a shop nearby that still comes close. The owner has >>> a thing for titanium so he has a stunning collection (for sale) of obscure >>> quirky bespoke ti bikes with wide tires, fenders and all the trimmings. As >>> that does raise my blood pressure in a most enjoyable way I always drop in >>> when I happen to ride by. >>> >>> Jock >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 12:09 PM Brady Smith <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I've settled on five as my ideal stable: >>>> >>>> 1) E-cargo bike. It's a car replacement. Gets the most miles of any >>>> bike. >>>> >>>> 2) My Roadini as general road bike. >>>> >>>> 3) BMC Monster Cross as rando/light touring bike >>>> >>>> 4) La Cabra--in theory it's my gravel/forest road bike but practically >>>> it's my city bike when I'm riding with my child or want to carry stuff >>>> without e-assist. There's also a few mixed surface rides in my area for >>>> which it is pretty much perfect. >>>> >>>> 5) Specialized Fuse Comp: I tried to make singletrack work on the La >>>> Cabra for a while. It was fine, but this is much better. Plus I got it for >>>> 50% off. >>>> >>>> I could let the La Cabra go and still be fine, but it's a fun bike for >>>> what it is, and it adds a backup if for some reason the Fuse goes down. >>>> I've occasionally thought about a modern carbon road bike as I get more >>>> into the local club scene, but I keep up just fine on the Roadini, and >>>> other riders are always checking it out, which I enjoy. Other than the >>>> cargo bike, I tend to use each of these very seasonally, so maintenance is >>>> rarely an issue for more than two bikes at a time. >>>> On Friday, March 14, 2025 at 12:42:43 PM UTC-6 Patrick Moore wrote: >>>> >>>>> The usual cycle goes like this: get disgusted with too many bikes; >>>>> sell ‘em off and keep only the favorite; learn in 6 months that the >>>>> favorite won’t do [insert special riding conditions here] as well as x or >>>>> y, so buy a replacement or several. >>>>> >>>>> Me, I don’t like excess, which is why I’ve decided that 3 bikes is the >>>>> natural if not statutory minimum: road bike that is equipped to pedal as >>>>> easily and comfortably and fast as possible on pavement; a road bike with >>>>> carrying capacity, fenders, lights, and tires that can handle light dirt; >>>>> and a dirt road bike that is nice on pavement. On this foundation you can >>>>> expand in any direction you care to. >>>>> >>>>> This scenario avoids the “perfect bike” syndrome — unattractive, I >>>>> agree — by having 3 perfect bikes. >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 3:14 PM Nicolas H <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>> Lately I've actually been really intrigued by this idea of doing less >>>>>> with more, which I guess is what we consider underbiking. I guess the >>>>>> idea >>>>>> of having the "perfect" bike seems both naive and a little un-attractive >>>>>> for some reason. Maybe others can chime on this indescribable feeling >>>>>> I'm >>>>>> trying to articulate. On the other hand, I might just be trying to talk >>>>>> myself out of buying an Atlantis. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Nic >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Mar 9, 2025 at 5:38 PM John Bokman <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>> Ahh...the One bike to rule them all. I've tried for years! My Sam can >>>>>>> indeed fulfill pretty much all the riding I'm likely to do. This means >>>>>>> city >>>>>>> riding (commute and recreation), touring, and off-pavement riding that >>>>>>> isn't gnarly (anything requiring more than the 43mm Bruce Gordon Rock >>>>>>> n' >>>>>>> Road tires I use for off-roading). BUT: my limitation is fenderability. >>>>>>> Here in Western Oregon, I like fenders, most of the year. My Sam won't >>>>>>> accept 43mm tires with fenders...And I don't want to commute nor tour >>>>>>> without them. Thus, my thoughts of a second bike. If I lived in Riv's >>>>>>> locale, I think I could pretty much do it all on Sam. But, I don't. I'm >>>>>>> surprised you aren't be-fendered in your neck of the woods. Must be >>>>>>> drier >>>>>>> up there than I thought. Or your tolerance for slop is greater than >>>>>>> mine. >>>>>>> Either way, good on you, Jay. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> John >>>>>>> Oregon >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Saturday, March 8, 2025 at 6:48:26 PM UTC-8 Jay wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Lot's of great info shared - thank you! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> My takeaway so far is that the nature of "unpaved" varies and that >>>>>>>> my Roadini, in comparison to my Fargo, will win some, and lose some. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As an example, I've been riding my Fargo throughout the winter, >>>>>>>> mainly with 2.2" tubeless gravel tires on paved roads. Some of these >>>>>>>> roads >>>>>>>> have had work done in the past 6 months and the paving is awful. The >>>>>>>> Roadini is so much smoother over these roads (Roadini with 43 GKSS, >>>>>>>> tubed). The frame flex is noticeable, in a really good way. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> My local mixed-surface trails, which are mainly crushed limestone, >>>>>>>> with technical sections, is where I'm hoping the Roadini will do well. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I've only taken the Fargo on these trails because that's why I bought >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> bike in the first place. It does awesome on the trails, and I'm >>>>>>>> moving >>>>>>>> around a lot on the bike, so the bike has fine been fine. But on long >>>>>>>> road >>>>>>>> rides in the winter, not so good. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I still dream of the Roadini being the one bike to rule them all >>>>>>>> (my *them*), and having like 4 wheel sets! figured I could have my >>>>>>>> two >>>>>>>> existing wheels: 43mm GKSS for most road rides, which includes doses >>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>> trails; 30mm fast rubber on dura-ace wheels for road rides with >>>>>>>> friends; >>>>>>>> and then I would add, knobbies for trail rides, and a set of winter >>>>>>>> studded >>>>>>>> tires. I would be reluctant to ride her much in winter due to the >>>>>>>> salty >>>>>>>> roads (even though I clean my Fargo after every ride), plus the rim >>>>>>>> brakes. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Monday, March 3, 2025 at 5:53:20 PM UTC-5 [email protected] >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> TRAIL: >>>>>>>>> Honestly the biggest factor has been cockpit. You are correct the >>>>>>>>> geo is almost identical. I’ve never made a 1:1 comparison between my >>>>>>>>> two >>>>>>>>> bikes with same cockpit, but the drop bars I had on Sam are now on >>>>>>>>> Leo. >>>>>>>>> When I had only one bike, it was Sam, and I would switch from drops >>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>> other bars too often, and thus decided to get a second bike. On >>>>>>>>> technical >>>>>>>>> trails with drop bars the Sam felt great, until descents get steep, >>>>>>>>> then >>>>>>>>> it’s sketchy. Now that it has Billie bars (I've also used Simworks >>>>>>>>> getaround and ahearne MAP) those same descents are fun. The geometry >>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>> both bikes can handle trail riding if you are skilled and comfortable >>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>> that stuff. Biggest impact to the trail riding experience will be >>>>>>>>> cockpit >>>>>>>>> and wheel/tire choice. Also if you weigh 175lbs or more and only want >>>>>>>>> one >>>>>>>>> of these two bikes, I’d say Sam all day. Roadini flexes a lot for me. >>>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>>> don’t think I knew what flex was until pushing myself and my Roadini. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ROAD: >>>>>>>>> I don’t have any carbon or aluminum road bike experience to >>>>>>>>> compare to. Compared to 80s-90s steel road bikes with 25mm tires, >>>>>>>>> both Sam >>>>>>>>> and Leo are Cadillacs. Super comfy. Road manners are most affected by >>>>>>>>> tires >>>>>>>>> and cockpit. I’ve done centuries on both and they rule. Again I would >>>>>>>>> stress that since the geo is the same, I’d consider the Roadini if >>>>>>>>> you have >>>>>>>>> a slimmer build, and if you’re closer to 200lbs I’d go Sam all day. >>>>>>>>> The >>>>>>>>> “road performance” of Roadini was negligible in comparison. I >>>>>>>>> consider my >>>>>>>>> Roadini 'faster' only because it has drops, lighter wheels, smoother >>>>>>>>> tires, >>>>>>>>> no racks, minimal baggage, just less weight overall. Never weighed >>>>>>>>> either >>>>>>>>> bike. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> OBVIOUS: >>>>>>>>> The trails that felt sketchy on my Sam w/drop bars do not get >>>>>>>>> ridden by me on the Roadini, at all. Yes the Roadini is way more >>>>>>>>> trail >>>>>>>>> capable than most dedicated road bikes, because the geo is chill and >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> tires (on mine) are fat (42 Cavas). The bike does have limits, >>>>>>>>> though, and >>>>>>>>> I don't need to push those limits because I have a Hillborne. Despite >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> matching geometry I would hastily rate the Sam [60/40 Road/Trail] and >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> Leo [80/20 Road/Trail] >>>>>>>>> On Monday, March 3, 2025 at 2:22:13 PM UTC-8 [email protected] >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Interesting thread. I own a 57 Sam set up with drop bars / 42mm >>>>>>>>>> gravel kings. I had the opportunity to build a lugged 54 roadini, >>>>>>>>>> I’m >>>>>>>>>> luckily on the cusp of both sizes. What persuaded me to follow >>>>>>>>>> through >>>>>>>>>> despite the quite obvious similarities, was the ability to size >>>>>>>>>> down. >>>>>>>>>> Looking forward to a more road build. Will report back once I have >>>>>>>>>> some >>>>>>>>>> riding done, super stoked. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Franco Rinaldi >>>>>>>>>> c: 646.403.0661 <(646)%20403-0661> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -Pardon any typos, Siri typed this message- >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Mar 3, 2025, at 5:00 PM, John Bokman <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I have more or less the same questions as Mike in BK. I ride a >>>>>>>>>> 2017 58cm Sam, and the equivalent sized Roadini (a 57cm as it >>>>>>>>>> happens) has >>>>>>>>>> almost identical numbers. The number I'm most interested in would be >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> front center. But they don't list those stats anymore in the geo >>>>>>>>>> charts? >>>>>>>>>> From email exchange with Will, the two frames will ride very >>>>>>>>>> similarly. I >>>>>>>>>> wouldn't be surprised if the tubing is indeed slightly different - >>>>>>>>>> or not - >>>>>>>>>> but I'm not sure if I'd notice it. What I would notice, however, is >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> front center measurement; Ideally I would want more than I currently >>>>>>>>>> get >>>>>>>>>> with my Sam (61.8cm, according to Bike Insights). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> John >>>>>>>>>> Oregon >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Monday, March 3, 2025 at 8:17:38 AM UTC-8 Mike in BK wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Brenton, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> If you have a 57 Roadini and a 57 Sam from a recent MIT >>>>>>>>>>> generation, their geos looks very similar (like, very). With the >>>>>>>>>>> Sam being >>>>>>>>>>> more stout and a little longer, how would you compare the rides? >>>>>>>>>>> Interested >>>>>>>>>>> in the feel on the road and capabilities on non-paved roads (which >>>>>>>>>>> you've >>>>>>>>>>> already described a bit here). >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>>>> Mike >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, February 8, 2025 at 11:39:25 AM UTC-5 >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I ride my Roadini all over. I'm on a 57 as well. 6'1" and >>>>>>>>>>>> 185lbs. I have 32H dyad hoops. Only used Ultradynamico Cava 42s on >>>>>>>>>>>> it so >>>>>>>>>>>> far. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I have thrown the rear wheel out of true after getting "air" >>>>>>>>>>>> off some roots on familiar trails. That's about as crazy as I get, >>>>>>>>>>>> and I've >>>>>>>>>>>> learned not to beat on it the way I can do with my Sam. Sam has 36 >>>>>>>>>>>> hole >>>>>>>>>>>> Atlas wheels. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, February 8, 2025 at 6:10:35 AM UTC-8 >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Looking forward to answers to this. I have a Hilsen set up for >>>>>>>>>>>>> road riding, with slicks and a dark-boston-winter-inspired >>>>>>>>>>>>> dynamo, and I >>>>>>>>>>>>> love it -- it's fast and so comfortable -- and have no plans to >>>>>>>>>>>>> make any >>>>>>>>>>>>> big changes. >>>>>>>>>>>>> (Except maybe to Paul brakes -- big for the wallet.) >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thinking of getting a Roadini or an Atlantis next, for trail >>>>>>>>>>>>> riding but also, sometimes, commuting. On first glance, it seems >>>>>>>>>>>>> like the >>>>>>>>>>>>> Atlantis would be the smart choice, but I like the geo of the >>>>>>>>>>>>> roadini >>>>>>>>>>>>> better, like that it's a little lighter, like that the lugged >>>>>>>>>>>>> version seems >>>>>>>>>>>>> more rack friendly, and I'm just not convinced that a somewhat >>>>>>>>>>>>> experienced >>>>>>>>>>>>> (def not expert) rider needs anything bigger than a 43/45 tired >>>>>>>>>>>>> unless >>>>>>>>>>>>> he/she is hitting mountain trails. (For which a mountain bike >>>>>>>>>>>>> will always >>>>>>>>>>>>> be better.) I have a crust bombora, which I would gift to my son, >>>>>>>>>>>>> and on >>>>>>>>>>>>> all kinds of trails I've never felt any ride-feel difference >>>>>>>>>>>>> between a 42 >>>>>>>>>>>>> tire and a 50. So curious about others' experiences. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jay, thanks for asking this questions, and as far as tire >>>>>>>>>>>>> advice, I really love the soma cazaderos for what you're >>>>>>>>>>>>> describing. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers! >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, February 8, 2025 at 7:50:23 AM UTC-5 Jay wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have the 2023 Roadini, size 57. I LOVE the bike and how it >>>>>>>>>>>>>> feels, every time I get on it after a long break (riding another >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bike on >>>>>>>>>>>>>> snowy/salty roads) I'm reminded of just how good it fits, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> handles, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> feels. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm thinking of adding a third wheel set, for mainly unpaved >>>>>>>>>>>>>> riding (more below). *I'm curious as to your experience >>>>>>>>>>>>>> with this bike on gravel roads, trails, etc.* I realize >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bike configs will differ, as to the specific riding conditions, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> but to me >>>>>>>>>>>>>> this is not a road bike like the ones I've had previously, so I >>>>>>>>>>>>>> want to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> push the envelope and see what terrain I can ride, somewhat >>>>>>>>>>>>>> comfortably. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Recap*: Bought it a year ago and had two wheel sets from >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the start, one with Dura-Ace wheels I already had, and 30mm >>>>>>>>>>>>>> tires for road >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rides with a friend, who is faster than me (me and the bike can >>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep up! so >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it has replaced my road bike); the other with new 105 hubs and H >>>>>>>>>>>>>> plus son >>>>>>>>>>>>>> archetype rims with 43mm GKSS tires for every other ride, which >>>>>>>>>>>>>> includes >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rail trails, short sections of gravel paths connecting roads, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and 100% >>>>>>>>>>>>>> paved rides when on my own (I like the added comfort and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> versatility over >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the 30mm tires). Swapping wheels is so easy, pop the quick >>>>>>>>>>>>>> release on the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> TRP levers and on the other one on the brake callipers, swap >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wheels, barrel >>>>>>>>>>>>>> adjuster on the calliper to adjust pads to rim, done. I'm >>>>>>>>>>>>>> always playing >>>>>>>>>>>>>> records when messing around with the bike, and this is a "one >>>>>>>>>>>>>> song" >>>>>>>>>>>>>> adjustment lol >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I was to add a third wheel set, I think I would want go >>>>>>>>>>>>>> tubeless, with supple 43-45mm tires with an aggressive tread. I >>>>>>>>>>>>>> want to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> maximize comfort and also have a tire that can corner on loose >>>>>>>>>>>>>> gravel, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ride comfortably over choppy gravel roads (on longer mixed >>>>>>>>>>>>>> surface rides). >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The 43mm GKSS tires are great, and I run that at 30psi if mixed >>>>>>>>>>>>>> surface, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> but they lack comfort on chunky terrain and don't handle my >>>>>>>>>>>>>> twisty gravel >>>>>>>>>>>>>> trails very well (where as my Salsa Fargo with 2.2" tubeless >>>>>>>>>>>>>> tires, smooth >>>>>>>>>>>>>> centre / knobby corners, is great). >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Looking for your input about this bike's capability >>>>>>>>>>>>>> unpaved/off-road, our experience, and recommendations for TLR >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rims, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> tires as described above. Thanks! >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion visit >>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/ef0bac3b-ec32-47cb-9d83-f15ca5bf02c0n%40googlegroups.com >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/ef0bac3b-ec32-47cb-9d83-f15ca5bf02c0n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>> >>>>>> To view this discussion visit >>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/c8b71a18-d511-4f12-8080-d66f54e2e642n%40googlegroups.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/c8b71a18-d511-4f12-8080-d66f54e2e642n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>>>> . >>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>> >>>>> To view this discussion visit >>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/CAC_QeUKQ-%3DjDajB8dSgbXB0kL%2BZcxb%2B%3D6Q76Hvag%3Dw%2Bdug9tEw%40mail.gmail.com >>>>>> >>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/CAC_QeUKQ-%3DjDajB8dSgbXB0kL%2BZcxb%2B%3D6Q76Hvag%3Dw%2Bdug9tEw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>>> . >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> Patrick Moore >>>>> Alburquerque, Nuevo Mexico, Etats Unis d'Amerique, Orbis Terrarum >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> >>>>> Executive resumes, LinkedIn profiles, bios, letters, and other >>>>> writing services >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> >>>>> *When thou didst not, savage, k**now thine own meaning,* >>>>> >>>>> *But wouldst gabble like a** thing most brutish,* >>>>> >>>>> *I endowed thy purposes w**ith words that made them known.* >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>> >>> To view this discussion visit >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/b3fc1f6d-d49a-483d-9903-12dedf3c8380n%40googlegroups.com >>>> >>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/b3fc1f6d-d49a-483d-9903-12dedf3c8380n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>> . >>>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/dd4e9309-9297-486c-882d-c9ba4928dd4bn%40googlegroups.com.
