What a great thread. I'm 6'1" w/ an 84.5 PBH and I generally like longer bikes. I recently purchased a 61 Platypus from someone on this list, but I haven't picked it up yet. I'm pretty comfortable riding in the drops on an traditional road bike geometry so i think the length will be an advantage.
On Wednesday, October 1, 2025 at 9:46:01 AM UTC-5 [email protected] wrote: > I went over to Walnut Creek in late February to test ride some of the new > models, especially the Charlie. I have a PBH of just about 85cm, close > enough to Grant's that I rode a few of his bikes. According to the geometry > chart either a 53cm or 57cm Charlie would work for me. The 53 seemed a > little cramped, but the 57 was great. Then Grant put me on his 61cm > Charlie, with "don't pay any attention to the size, just ride it". It was > just as good as the 57cm.. Grant basically says if you can comfortable > straddle the bike, you can comfortable ride it. And the larger size comes > with a quality that Grant can describe but I can't, that makes it more > stable. > > I eventually went with a Homer frame, but only because I wanted more > luggage carrying capacity that Charlie is recommended for. > > And, if I didn't live in a second floor walkup studio apartment, I would > absolutely get the *platypus giganticus, *the 60cm. That bike has the > most deluxe ride I can recall experiencing. > > Don't be afraid of the 61cm Charlie. > > Pat > > On Saturday, September 27, 2025 at 9:48:50 AM UTC-7 Bicycle Belle Ding > Ding! wrote: > >> I have an 81 cm PBH and I stand at 5’6”. I could have gone either 53 or >> 57, said Grant, but I went with 53, and I like it a lot. >> >> On Friday, September 26, 2025 at 12:12:19 PM UTC-4 Mike Gillespie wrote: >> >>> I’m considering a Charlie purchase for this round of frames. At 5’11” >>> and a PBH of 86.5cm I’m in the middle of the sizing range for the 57cm and >>> just over the lower limit for the 61cm. After seeing the attached photo of >>> Grant’s ride on a Blue Lug blog, I’m considering going with the 61. >>> According to the blog post, Grant’s PBH is 85cm, and he’s actually under >>> the lower sizing recommendation of 86cm. >>> >>> From the geometry chart it appears the greatest difference between the >>> 57 and 61 frames is increased stack height (+4.9cm) with only minor >>> increase in reach. The effective top tube increase is only 1cm. Meanwhile, >>> the reach calculation shows an actual decrease of 0.7cm. (This seems >>> counterintuitive to me and I’m thinking it’s a typo, or am I wrong)? >>> Regardless, I’m intrigued by Grant’s setup and wonder if there’s any >>> downside that I’m missing. Any recommendations? >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/bb0fda7a-a3fe-4e40-9130-e14a939a83ccn%40googlegroups.com.
