On Thursday, November 20, 2025 at 2:41:51 PM UTC-7 Roberta wrote:

Congratulations Max on the bike.   It seems like it’s a grail bike for many 
people.  What makes that so?  What is it about this bike?  I am truly 
interested and I’m looking forward to seeing more pictures and stories. 

Roberta



I can try to answer:

1.  For long-time fans of Rivendell, this is the model that best captures 
the spirit of what Grant originally set out to do.  In an era of 
almost-universal 23mm tires and twitchy geometries and no fender or rack 
provisions, this was the only way to get a road bike that would accommodate 
fat tires, and that could be a one-bike-to-do-anything.  (Using mountain 
bike tires, which were all 26" at the time.)  In today's bike market, it's 
hard to remember how unique that actually was.

2.  As a subjective matter, some people (myself included) really like the 
proportions of a large frame with small wheels.  It's unexpected, if you're 
used to something else, but looks right if you think in terms of 
form-follows-function.

3.  26" wheels on a road bike are REALLY enjoyable.  They have less 
inertial mass (is that a real term?), so they spin-up easier and allow the 
bike to accellerate faster.  They also have a lower gyroscopic center of 
gravity,  so they corner well and feel more planted.  I can't overstate 
this, and I'm not alone.  Whenever I ride a different road bike and come 
back to my AR (or XO-1), it just feels "right" - even if another bike might 
fit a little better or be more relaxed or a little lighter.

4.  When bikes had shorter wheelbases, as they generally did at the time, 
the smaller diameter virtually eliminated toe clip overlap, without making 
other geometry / handlingcompromises!

4.  As a touring/travel bike, 26" wheels are (were?) ideal, because tires 
are available almost anywhere in the world.

5.  During this era, Rivendell frames were built-to-order, so they were 
essentially "custom," even as one of the semi-standard models.  They had  
some of the best framebuilders in the world doing them, and they are like 
works of functional art.  Joe and Joe collaborated on some of the nicest 
ones. It's hard to appreciate without seeing them in person and 
side-by-side with a production model, but the perfectionism and attention 
to detail is beautiful.  Imagine the edge of every lug being touched in 
some way, filed and thinned and perfectly brazed.





 


On Wednesday, November 19, 2025 at 11:49:12 AM UTC-5 maxcr wrote:

Hi Everyone,

As mentioned in the CL thread, I was the lucky buyer of the AR from eBay.

Here's a bad photo from my basement last night after picking it up. I 
promise better photos at some point in the future:

[image: IMG_8327.jpg]

I've always been curious about the early models, the 26 wheels on large 
frame with a tighter geo, canti posts and great tire clearance made it 
super appealing to me. The price was fair, larger ARs don't come up for 
sale often.

I'm really happy that my hunch was correct, it's a 59! Which is the 
goldilocks size for me and more appropriate than 57 or 58. 

The seller said that the owner was a doctor who recently passed away and 
his wife has been slowly selling his bikes through a friend who used to 
work at their LBS (he has a couple of tandems, a Jack Taylor, a Ti Seven 
and others that he's going to list). The bike has the original owners name 
in the top tube, which is kinda cool, to keep the legacy going for him.

Now the details. The bike is an early model. Based on the serial (JS0030) 
and the JB in the chain stay, it's a Joe Starck /Joe Bell combo from 2000. 
It's also number 30. 30 what? I don't know, the 30th All-Rounder ever 
built? Maybe.

The metallic blue paint with the cream head tube is just amazing even after 
25 years. There are some minor blemishes and chips as you would expect from 
a bike that has been ridden, but it's really in top condition.

I will probably ride it as is for a bit, but have plans to rebuild it. The 
Ultegra group with brifters isn't what I want. I will probably keep the 
drops (they say N Grand Randoneur which I assume is a Nitto noodle variant) 
but need to see if they will work for me. I also plan to swap out the 
drivetrain - probably put on a NOS Ritchey Logic crankset that I have or a 
TA Carmina that I recently acquired paired with an XTR rapid rise RD (or 
maybe an OM-1?). 

For tires, I'd love your thoughts. I'm thinking of RH Rat Trap Pass tires, 
unless you convince me that the Naches Pass or the Simworks Homage are a 
better option. I might want to keep it fendered, not sure... but these 
fenders won't clear a really wide tire.

Anyway, please offer your suggestions as I rethink this build. It won't 
happen until next year given my time availability and other projects in the 
pipeline. 

As you can see my downsizing isn't going well. I think I'm up to 11 with 
the latest purchase of that time capsule brown Saluki and this AR. At some 
point some will have to go, but I have a feeling that the AR is a keeper.

Cheers
Max in Boston

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/be590834-1828-4996-a402-ba80c0e1adbcn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to