If your argument works equally well if we substitute "being a pedestrian" or "taking a shower" for "cycling," then you might want to reconsider your logic.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Travis <travisbreitenb...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've searched extensively as well and cannot find anything > scientifically convincing. However, here are a couple of very simple > questions which may be helpful: > > 1) Do helmets reduce the extent of head or neck injuries incurred by > impact to the head? > 2) Does cycling increase the likelihood of impact to the head, whether > or not a helmet is in use? > > If you have a suspicion that the answer to each of these questions is > "Yes," you should probably wear a helmet. > > Travis Breitenbach > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "RBW Owners Bunch" group. > To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en. > > -- -- Anne Paulson My hovercraft is full of eels -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
