Also, I think that Keven has a 91 cm pbh (lol that I know that) and he has the 58. Food for thought. It seems like the writeup strongly suggests that the correct size for you would be 58 cm.
On May 25, 6:15 am, Thomas Lynn Skean <[email protected]> wrote: > Oh, and I forgot to mention... RBW's geometry PDF says the 62cm > Hunqapillar has a standover of 90.6cm. > > That's close enough to warrant a real world test before deciding. > > Yours, > Thomas Lynn Skean > > On May 24, 1:53 pm, dweendaddy <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I am around the same size as you and have been looking longingly at > > Hunqas. According to the Riv site: > > 5-9" to 5-11: 54cm > > Long-legged 5-10" to 6-1: 58cm > > Long legged 6ft to 6-4.4: 62cm > > > Just wondering - why are you thinking 62 vs 58? If you want it do be > > maximally different than the Sam, you might want to put big tires on > > it and then, according to the site: > > 62cm Hunqa: 91.5-100cm PBH (Saddle hight 82-90cm, standover on biggest > > tire is 91.5cm) > > > Now I like big bikes, but having a standover taller than my PBH is > > stretching it, so to speak! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
