On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 4:24 PM, stevep33 <steve...@gmail.com> wrote: > There is a satisfying simplicity in having fewer bikes.... > > but 2 is really pushing it. Inevitably 1 bike will always be out of > order, and then you would not have more than 1 to choose from. 3 is > just better. >
I believe Grant definitively gave the required number of bikes in RR 42: How many bikes: seven is good. a beater, a bomber, a single-speed, a tour- ing bike, a lightish road bike, a do-all racked and bagged bike, a mixte, a loaner, and a work in progress. seven? Make it nine. so there you go - you have a deficit of 6 bikes to fill in there :) better get crackin' -sv -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
