There may be a misunderstanding here. I think you'll find stated on line 2 of Dave's chart that the number given for the 6 degree TT bikes is the theoretical length. The internet spreadsheet looks to me consistent with the previous pdf I downloaded and also from when I talked with Jay on the day I test rode a 64cm Sam and a 62cm Hunqa earlier this year.
Maybe Dave will confirm. On Dec 2, 6:52 am, newenglandbike <[email protected]> wrote: > On Friday, December 2, 2011 9:33:39 AM UTC-5, Garth wrote: > > > Is the chart up to date accurate though? When I inquired about a 62cm. > > Hunq frame, I was informed the TT was more like 64 or 64.5cm , I can't > > remember which. That would change some other dimensions as well. The chart > > shows the original specs, but nothing new as far as I can tell. > > I think the actual TT on the 58 is ~61cm which makes the theoretical TT > about 63cm, and the actual TT on the 62 is ~63cm and the theoretical TT is > about 65. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
