Thanks for sharing.  I have been thinking about a new crank for an '84 Trek 
I still ride and your review is helpful.  I assme that the double could be 
converted to triple?  I think your 44/28 set up makes a lot of sense, 
although I find I much prefer the shifting pattern with a 14 tooth drop 
over a 16.  I run a 44/30 White Ind. crank on my Ram and really like it.   
I'm considering it, or the DaVinci Crank, which is actually made by White.

BTW, very nicely set up bike.

Michael

On Sunday, May 27, 2012 3:36:06 AM UTC-4, stonehog wrote:
>
> I've been commuting for the past few weeks with one of the new Rene Herse 
> cranks on my AHH.  http://www.compasscycle.com/cranks_bb.html  I haven't 
> seen any reviews on this yet, so I figured I would share a few 
> thoughts/opinions with the group.  I'm not really a crankoholic, and have 
> mainly ridden wider Q mountain cranks.  I mainly wanted to upgrade the bike 
> a bit, and thought a well built crankset would be a nice add.  Something 
> that would last as long as the frame, perhaps.   
>
> I've never had any experience with a narrow tread road bike, and was a bit 
> worried that having a narrow Q would be a problem.  So far that has not 
> worked out to be the case.  I find it comfortable, and natural.  The length 
> of these are 171mm, which is close to what I'm finding to be ideal for me.  
> I tend to lately favor the 170mm cranks I have on another bike over the 
> 175mm I've been using for the past 20 years.  
>
> The finish and feel of these cranks is indeed very nice, and every bit as 
> good as it has been billed.  The chainrings are nice and thick, but 
> elegant.  To me, these cranks feel more solid than the others I've used 
> lately including Sugino XD, Suntour XC Pro, and modern Shimano Deore and XT 
> cranks, as well as a Race Face outboard bearing set I have on my mtb.   
> They are very nice to look at, as well, with a highly polished finish, and 
> simple, clean and classy lines that go really well with the Rivendell 
> frame.  
>
> It was recommended by Jan that I use a 110mm bottom bracket, so I ordered 
> one, but decided to try the cranks with a 107mm that I had on already.  
> They went on easily, and the arms have at least 3-5mm clearance with the 
> chainstays.  The chainline is adequate, as well.  I got 44/28 rings to go 
> with an 11-32 cassette.  This gives me plenty of range for the hilly riding 
> I do in the area.  Bottom line - I highly recommend these.  Love em!
>
> Pics:
>
> http://flic.kr/s/aHsjzzumnw
>
> Brian
> Seattle, WA
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/I284SAlpLkUJ.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

Reply via email to