On Thursday, August 9, 2012 4:15:43 PM UTC-7, NME wrote: > > Can anyone recommend their hard case for airline traveling and shipping? > I'm going to ramble a bit on this subject, as it is important to me -- I hope you won't mind. This subject is a bit of a can of worms. I have flown a coupled bike many times, and I own two of them. I use the S&S case which is expensive and which works well, although the first time you pack it, it will be a Japanese puzzle. I pack very slowly when I'm getting ready to leave on the trip, and it takes me about an hour; but I can pack in half an hour if pushed. Assembly takes about half an hour. Pack the night before, not the morning of. On a related subject, I rather regret having an expensive custom bike coupled. I wish I had simply stuck with my inexpensive production coupled bike, a Gunnar. US Air/Air France lost my Gunnar for two weeks, and I assumed I would never see it again. It was eventually recovered, but I am now very reluctant to put a custom which I consider special and valuable on a plane. My new attitude is, don't load anything onto a commercial aircraft which you are not willing to lose. But now returning to the subject of the case. Cases that are worth owning are expensive. I think you should figure out exactly which direction you are going with the travel bike before you invest money in a temporary solution. Another strategy -- some bike travellers (one internet presence with a very high opinion of his own opinion comes to mind) have argued that couplers are dumb, special cases are dumb, and the best way to go is to use a bike shop box. That strategy has become impracticably expensive on most or all carriers, and I think that the coupled solution is the best solution available at this time. One time I loaded too many additional items, including tools, into my S&S case, I didn't check my weight, and I was over 50#. The surcharge was going to be $200-something. I repacked in the airport, something which is to be avoided. The Ritchey case is oversized. I have flown it, and I wasn't charged, but I doubt I would get away with it again. So, to come back to my earlier comment -- I think you need to make a decision about your bike strategy before you make a decision about your box strategy. I just found this link, and they are doing things a bit differently: http://ravellobikes.com/travel%20bikes.htm Compact architecture makes sense to me for a travel bike -- it will make a frame easier to pack, and will leave more room for other stuff. 650B as well, especially if you require a large-cross-section tire. Sorry for the rambling.
> I fly quite a bit and eventually will look into a folding bike or a > coupled bike, but for now I want to upgrade from the barebones soft-sided > Ground Effect Tardis bag I'd been taking. I'd originally skipped the hard > case because they are very heavy and I didn't want to risk extra overweight > charge, but now I see that the major airlines are declaring *no* liability > if the bike isn't packed in a hard-sided case. (Bonus points for a smaller > case that might fool airlines into thinking it's less than 62 linear inches > and/or not a bicycle.) > > (2) Can anyone recommend reasonably-priced but decent bike insurance? I > had some insurance in Germany, where I was until now, but I need to get > something in the US now. > > Thanks again and happy riding, > Nicole > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/eh11f8zStZgJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
