I fully agree with Pete. My Quickbeam needs a new top tube. At this point it's not cost-effective to replace it. So, I'd jump at a chance to replace the frame set. But, I want a similar bike - No double top tubes (a solution in search of a problem IMHO) or other "extras" like kickstand plates. It should be a simple bike.
On Sunday, December 22, 2013 12:39:41 PM UTC-8, Peter Pesce wrote: > > Agreed Jim. Wouldn't it just be easier to see if there were 30 people > willing to pre-order an actual SO/QB? I know there's no opportunity for > creative expression in that, but it does seem odd to try to satisfy demand > for the those bikes with a new bike that will explicitly NOT be those > bikes! I know GP uses "clone" in a pejorative sense but to "keep making" a > bike is not "cloning" it. Besides, aren't there business side advantages to > continuing to sell, though perhaps on a limited, pre order basis, the bike > for which you already amortized the tooling and development costs? > > I have a last gen silver QB and love it. If it were stolen or wrecked I'd > seriously consider paying custom-shop money for a new one. I'm not the > least bit interested in a NewBeam that has the chunky tube set of my Sam, > double top tubes, or wavy gravy curved rear triangle bits. To me that bike > would have nothing in common with a QB beyond the dropouts. > > Pete in CT > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
