No, sadly. I still get a segfault if any of the variables 'x', 'y', or
'weights' below are 'wrap'ped.
Davor
On 2010-05-11, at 1:30 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 11 May 2010 at 13:17, Davor Cubranic wrote:
> | Hmm, once I stopped using 'wrap' and just passed Armadillo objects using
> 'Named', I'm able to run unit tests with no errors.
> |
> | I.e., I now use:
> |
> | List data = List::create(_["x"] = x,
> | _["y"] = y);
> | const NumericVector out_r = predict_fn(loess_fn(formula_fn("y~x"),
> | data,
> | _["weights"] = weights,
> | _["span"] = span));
> |
> | Could the issue really have been caused my using 'wrap'? What does 'wrap'
> do that would lead to a segfault, that I now avoid by using 'Named'?
> |
> | Davor
> | (R 2.10.1, Rcpp 0.7.11, Armadillo 0.9.4)
>
> Could you see whether anything different happens with Rcpp 0.7.12 ?
>
> --
> Regards, Dirk
_______________________________________________
Rcpp-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
