aha, thanks for correcting me. on the inline/Rcpp division of labor. So, what you are suggesting should have been obvious to me.
I pass the class def in the include statement of the inline function? Is that it? I'll ping back after I try this. If this really works, then I think WinBUGS can finally die. -Whit 2010/10/5 Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org>: > > Hi Whit, > > On 5 October 2010 at 12:25, Whit Armstrong wrote: > | I just reviewed the Rcpp documentation. > > Great. Now tell us how to make it sticky so that we get you to contribute :) > > | I see plenty of cfunction/cxxfunction examples, but I'm curious > | whether one can provide a class definition inline in an R script and > | then initialize an instance of the class and call a method on the > | class. all inline in R. > | > | Is this feature something you all would consider adding to Rcpp? > > a) A change would be an inline feature, not an Rcpp feature. > > b) But we already do :) support this, and even use it in numerous cases in > the unit tests; this uses the include= argument to cxxfunction et al. > > So you can supply your templated logic in an R string to include= and then > use the code in an R string to to src= and pass it all through cxxfunction() > for a quick test. > > See e.g. runit.macros.R or or runit.Module.R. I think we also have blog > posts and / or vignette examples that use it. > > Hth, Dirk > > -- > Dirk Eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com > _______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
