On 10 January 2011 at 11:36, Dominick Samperi wrote: | | | On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org> wrote: | | | On 10 January 2011 at 11:04, Dominick Samperi wrote: | | On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org> | wrote: | | We (somewhat breathlessly) await your patches. | | | | I already submitted a clear explanation of how to fix the problem earlier | | in this thread, with examples. This involved a lot of work. The fix is | | straightforward (if tedious), and without this fix SEXP's will be | | unpredictably blown away, leading to a crash. | | Just let us know the URL of your carefully tested patch. | | | It is not my responsibility to fix your memory bugs. I have | contributed the solution. How and when you implement it | is up to you, and apps that depend on Rcpp may crash | unpredictably until you do.
Nonsense. You are just like a crank standing on a soap box in Hyde Park, proclaiming the end of the universe. You have contributed nothing of value here. I already debunked your so-called fix once before. By endlessly repeating the same claims, you are not enhancing your position. Neither does leaving your one package on CRAN in its will-not-even-compile state [1]. How much credibility does that give you, exactly? Please put up (patches are welcome), or shut up. Dirk [1] http://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_cxxPack.html -- Dirk Eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com _______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
