On 2/22/11 4:14 PM, "baptiste auguie" <baptiste.aug...@googlemail.com> wrote: >Hi, > >Out of curiosity I also ran a R CMD check on the CRAN version of Rcpp, >and it failed on my machine (10.5): Looks like the big difference might be 10.5 vs. 10.6. My compiler is the same as Simon's build machine. -- Ken Williams Senior Research Scientist Thomson Reuters http://labs.thomsonreuters.com _______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
- Re: [Rcpp-devel] Ancient Rcpp ... Dirk Eddelbuettel
- Re: [Rcpp-devel] Ancient Rcpp ... Simon Urbanek
- Re: [Rcpp-devel] Ancient Rcpp ... Dirk Eddelbuettel
- Re: [Rcpp-devel] Ancient Rcpp ... Simon Urbanek
- Re: [Rcpp-devel] Ancient Rcpp ... Dirk Eddelbuettel
- Re: [Rcpp-devel] Ancient Rcpp ... Simon Urbanek
- Re: [Rcpp-devel] Ancient Rcpp ... Ken.Williams
- Re: [Rcpp-devel] Ancient Rcpp ... Simon Urbanek
- Re: [Rcpp-devel] Ancient Rcpp ... Dirk Eddelbuettel
- Re: [Rcpp-devel] Ancient Rcpp ... baptiste auguie
- Re: [Rcpp-devel] Ancient Rcpp ... Ken.Williams
- Re: [Rcpp-devel] Building/link... Douglas Bates
- Re: [Rcpp-devel] Building/linking trouble with cxxfuncti... Christian Gunning
- Re: [Rcpp-devel] Building/linking trouble with cxxf... Ken.Williams
- Re: [Rcpp-devel] Building/linking trouble with ... Christian Gunning